muckefuck: (Default)
[personal profile] muckefuck
Yesterday, a slim personal note slipped in with the typical circulars and credit card solicitations in my mailbox. Since I never learned the surname of my stepbrother's fiancée, I was at first mystified. The note looked too humble to be a wedding invite in any case.

But that's what it is and it's left me in a bind. We've known for almost a year that they were planning to get married in California this summer and Monshu and I had started planning a vacation around it. Silly me, I had just assumed he would be invited. I've been with him almost four years and the three of them seemed to get along well during the family vacation last year. But his name wasn't on the envelope.

Strictly speaking, of course, this means he isn't invited. However, plenty of couples use formulations like "and guest" to avoid having to go through the trouble of learning who everyone's s.o.'s are. They didn't. So now I'm left with the equally unflattering conclusions that either (1) my stepmom's family is ignorant of wedding etiquette or (2) he's been deliberately omitted. That's their prerogative, of course. But I would like to think they know me well enough to know that it pisses me off--and that they like me enough that they wouldn't do that if they could avoid it. I don't want to get all shirty if this was a simple mistake or a difficult choice for them.

Of course, there's no easy way to find out. There's no polite, non-confrontational way to say, "Did you mean not to invite my boyfriend?"--especially given that chances are Monshu wouldn't even come if he were invited, since family events just aren't his thing. So I'm stuck having to find some delicate, indirect line of inquiry to avoid provoking the kind of pointless family squabble that weddings always seem to. Bleagh. And I was so looking forward to this one.
Date: 2003-03-07 06:57 am (UTC)

Re: sin of omission

From: [identity profile] mollpeartree.livejournal.com
If I recall correctly, Miss Manners doesn't believe in "and guest" or response cards in wedding invitations; the inviter is supposed to be able to take the trouble to find out the names of s.o.'s, while the invitee is supposed to be able to write an R.S.V.P. letter. (Or at least she didn't in her wedding etiquette book published back in the 80's. Possibly she has softened her stance since these customs are now completely ingrained.)
Date: 2003-03-07 07:49 am (UTC)

Re: sin of omission

From: (Anonymous)
Nope - Ms. Manners still thinks response cards are for wimps and that "and guest" is the tool of a lazy bride. I had several people tell me to just send their invitation to my wedding with "and guest" instead of addressing an invitation to their so, even though, if I am inviting you to my wedding, it makes sense that I know your last name...

-e

Profile

muckefuck: (Default)
muckefuck

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314 15161718
192021 22232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 07:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios