May. 3rd, 2019 03:04 pm
Designed to fail
After several grey days of rain, we finally had one that was fair and mild. Not too much of either (as I type this, it is "mostly cloudy", albeit still bright, and 8°C), but enough to convince me to take a walk at lunchtime. I first headed towards the lake, since an acquaintance mentioned that the water seemed high. I thought that that combined with winds from the north would lead to some notable waves but it didn't. Judging from the amount of visible beach, I didn't even think the water was particularly elevated but then I passed by the spillway for the lagoon and noticed almost no difference between the levels in both bodies. (The USACE confirms that Michigan is about 23 cm higher than this time last year.)
As I crossed campus, I was once again struck by our dismal landscaping. With all the rain lately (the storm sewers are so overloaded the city has been asking us to postpone clothes washing), swales, permeable paving, and other means of reducing surface runoff have been on my mind. So as I walked through the recently-landscaped area adjoining the old parking garage, I took note of what opportunities had been missed.
But what also struck me is just how illegible our campus is. I decided to pass to the inside of the new music building in order to stay in the sun and out of the wind before cutting over to the lagoon. Because I know the campus, I know there's a gap between it and the concert hall, but that's not at all obvious when you approach the latter from the south. You do see a bit of road curving to the right, but does it just dead end at a loading dock?
The same mistake was repeated on a smaller scale in the student centre, which I ducked into to warm up after taking some snaps alongside the lagoon. They recently added some snazzy new booths on the edges of the dining area in order to increase seating capacity. Unfortunately, one of the places they've added them is in the approach to exit. Despite the presence of some wide pillars, it was possible to see the stairs to the main entrance from almost anywhere in the room. Now there are several angles from which they're effectively hidden.
I suppose there are two competing approaches to design at play here. One (which is a major component of feng shui) holds that it is more artful to conceal entrances and exits by offsetting them. The other (championed by Jane Jacobs, among others) states that people like clear sightlines, particularly when plotting a route through an urban space. Here we don't follow either consistently. So at the library, for instance, we have a wide main corridor running nearly the length of the structure, but the turnoffs for the elevators and the connecting tunnels to the adjoining building are almost completely hidden.
I guess that's what you get at an institution with a shit-tonne of majors in business and management but no graduate programmes in architecture or design?
As I crossed campus, I was once again struck by our dismal landscaping. With all the rain lately (the storm sewers are so overloaded the city has been asking us to postpone clothes washing), swales, permeable paving, and other means of reducing surface runoff have been on my mind. So as I walked through the recently-landscaped area adjoining the old parking garage, I took note of what opportunities had been missed.
But what also struck me is just how illegible our campus is. I decided to pass to the inside of the new music building in order to stay in the sun and out of the wind before cutting over to the lagoon. Because I know the campus, I know there's a gap between it and the concert hall, but that's not at all obvious when you approach the latter from the south. You do see a bit of road curving to the right, but does it just dead end at a loading dock?
The same mistake was repeated on a smaller scale in the student centre, which I ducked into to warm up after taking some snaps alongside the lagoon. They recently added some snazzy new booths on the edges of the dining area in order to increase seating capacity. Unfortunately, one of the places they've added them is in the approach to exit. Despite the presence of some wide pillars, it was possible to see the stairs to the main entrance from almost anywhere in the room. Now there are several angles from which they're effectively hidden.
I suppose there are two competing approaches to design at play here. One (which is a major component of feng shui) holds that it is more artful to conceal entrances and exits by offsetting them. The other (championed by Jane Jacobs, among others) states that people like clear sightlines, particularly when plotting a route through an urban space. Here we don't follow either consistently. So at the library, for instance, we have a wide main corridor running nearly the length of the structure, but the turnoffs for the elevators and the connecting tunnels to the adjoining building are almost completely hidden.
I guess that's what you get at an institution with a shit-tonne of majors in business and management but no graduate programmes in architecture or design?