Oct. 1st, 2007 10:08 am
Keeping up with the times
Why do newscritters keep on referring to Rangoon (that's "Yangon" for you junta symps) as "the capital"? Didn't any of them get the memo? I don't think this is a minor detail either, since the uprising of 1988 (not to mention colour/flower-coded people power revolutions elsewhere) was a major factor in the decision to start afresh in the wilderness, Abuja-style.
Also: suck!
Also: suck!
no subject
Some British news sources still call the place "Burma." I really want to go see the new capital: one of my side projects is Manufactured Capitals of Late 20th Century Totalitarian States (begun when I visited Ashgabat, though Astana's pretty special, too. cf. Yamoussoukro and its famous Basilica) - everyone does Brasilia and Chandigarh, but these more recent projects seem even more, erm, interesting.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Maybe if they built their cities in the shape of an airplane or had Le Corbusier design them (or had Le Corbusier design them in the shape of an airplane...) they'd get get more press. I mean, Astana could have been made in the shape of an eagle or something. No imagination.
no subject
...so when Rem Koolhaas knocks down Beijing and rebuilds it in the shape of an iPhone, it'll get some attention.
no subject
no subject
Actiually, I was being absent-minded when I mentioned Beijing: there's a fair chance that even the America architectural press might notice stuff happening there right now - I suppose I thought of it because, well I'm here, on your LJ. I think Koolhaas' star might even illuminate benighted Central Africa or Ecuador, should he find himself working there.