Mar. 9th, 2007 02:40 pm
Dubious distinctions
At lunch today, I was helping one of my more lefty co-workers on with his jacket. Ignoring his protestations, I said, "Every man should know what it's like to have a valet," pronouncing the last word in the manner of Bertie Wooster. "Oh," he replied, "you're one of those people who says ['valɪt]."
"A [væ'leɪ] is someone who parks your car," I shot back. "Someone who helps you with your clothes is a ['valɪt]."
"A [væ'leɪ] is someone who parks your car," I shot back. "Someone who helps you with your clothes is a ['valɪt]."
no subject
Incidentally, according to Wikipedia, that infallible repository of world knowledge: "the older pronunciation in which the 't' was pronounced (so 'valet' rhymes with 'pallet') [is] considered old-fashioned or even ignorant."
Wikipedia says you're ignorant. Must be true then. ;)
no subject
(Interestingly, the only other pronunciation given is ['væleɪ], with initial stress; there's no mention of what is by far the most usual pronunciation in the single most populous English-speaking nation on the planet. So, perhaps, calling the OED "ignorant" on this point isn't as off-base as it seems.)
no subject
I've only ever heard the 't' pronounced by an English speaker in the word 'valeting', in the sense of having a car professionally cleaned in the UK. I don't think I ever had my car parked for me over there, so I have no idea how they pronounced that profession. I do think I've noticed some of the more American spelling and pronunciation trends missing from the OED in the past, so there may be some bias there.
As such, I think we should rely solely on Wikipedia.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Bertie Wooster's good enough for me: I'll take it as archaic "U" and be done. Related to "varlet" - a low person.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject