It's the premise of the protest that bothers me. If this was a counter-protest to a "yes on Prop 8" celebration, I wouldn't have a problem. But it's not. It is specifically a protest against Mormons for having dared to legally use their free speech rights. That's about as anti-liberal as it gets, It puts these gay rights advocates in about the same position as animal rights whackjobs like SHAC.
Put it this way: there is already the promise of more litigation in the wake of this amendment. Do you think it would count as a chilling effect on the free speech of the "no" advocates if, after a court filing, a few thousand LDS members converged on a well-known gay bar for days, jumping on cars and directly confronting anyone who tries to pass through their ranks? Or would you pass that off as "a few noisy protesters"?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-07 05:05 am (UTC)Put it this way: there is already the promise of more litigation in the wake of this amendment. Do you think it would count as a chilling effect on the free speech of the "no" advocates if, after a court filing, a few thousand LDS members converged on a well-known gay bar for days, jumping on cars and directly confronting anyone who tries to pass through their ranks? Or would you pass that off as "a few noisy protesters"?