Yeah, I never bought the textbook because I couldn't stomach one completely devoid of Han'geul (a.k.a., in dreaded Yale, /hankul/). His dictionary has all entries in Han'geul followed by Yale, which is much more palatable.
I won't call the reference grammar pretty to look out or easy to use, but it is the most comprehensive one I've seen so far. There are a number of descriptions of the language out there (e.g. Homin Sohn's Korean and The Korean language, Lee & Ramsey's The Korean language, etc.) but none delves so deep into the nitty gritty. He even has Middle Korean morphology in there! Just the ticket if you want to read 용비어천가 in the original!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-09 03:26 am (UTC)I won't call the reference grammar pretty to look out or easy to use, but it is the most comprehensive one I've seen so far. There are a number of descriptions of the language out there (e.g. Homin Sohn's Korean and The Korean language, Lee & Ramsey's The Korean language, etc.) but none delves so deep into the nitty gritty. He even has Middle Korean morphology in there! Just the ticket if you want to read 용비어천가 in the original!