Nov. 9th, 2004 11:34 am
Marriage--straight, gay, and otherwise
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
muckefuckSo I could write some catty things here about last weekend's family wedding, such as the fact that the self-composed vows inevitably brought to mind Lore's feature on the late Brunching Shuttlecocks or that they completely omitted any mention or acknowledgement of the bride's stepfather (despite impassioned assurances to me from one of the bride's intimates on his importance in her life). But I've come to the belated recognition that, since I have no intention of ever getting married and cannot, to my everlasting shame, master such absolute basics of wedding etiquette such as getting response cards and gifts to the couple in a timely fashion (if at all), my room to criticise is extremely limited indeed.
Until recently, there wasn't even any expectation that I might ever get married and, to tell the truth, I kind of miss the old days. My feelings about same-sex marriage (as I prefer to term it, since "gay marriage" implies that gays have never married before--plenty have, just not to other gays of the same sex--and that bisexuals only marry opposite sex partners, while "marriage equality" dilutes the issue to the point of obscurity--aren't polygamists seeking recognition of the "equality" of their unions as well?) can best be described as mixed. That's not surprising, since my attitude to marriage in general is mixed--as you might expect for someone coming from what is quaintly termed a "broken home".
I'm more bullish on it than anti-marriage advocates like![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
androkles who view it as something akin to a legal prison because I simply know too many people for whom it works extremely well. For many others, though, it's clearly a less-than-ideal arrangement. I think this is a consequence of it being something of a one-size-fits-all solution to a very complicated question. I'd always thought that queerfolk, being largely stranded outside of the traditional institution by societal norms, were in a unique position to come up with innovative and progressive alternatives and now I worry that too much energy is going into extending the existing institution to them without sufficiently altering it first.
Of course, it's just these sort of alterations that most terrrify already married folk. I thinklhn has done a fantastic job of presenting how their defensiveness is motivated by fear of change rather than homophobia and it would behoove more activists to familiarise themselves with this mindset, since, as he points out, calling your opponents "bigots" is not exactly a winning strategy when it comes to making friends and influencing policy. For those who find themselves despairing in the face of so much resistance, longtime activist topaz_munro sees victory in the face of defeat.
Until recently, there wasn't even any expectation that I might ever get married and, to tell the truth, I kind of miss the old days. My feelings about same-sex marriage (as I prefer to term it, since "gay marriage" implies that gays have never married before--plenty have, just not to other gays of the same sex--and that bisexuals only marry opposite sex partners, while "marriage equality" dilutes the issue to the point of obscurity--aren't polygamists seeking recognition of the "equality" of their unions as well?) can best be described as mixed. That's not surprising, since my attitude to marriage in general is mixed--as you might expect for someone coming from what is quaintly termed a "broken home".
I'm more bullish on it than anti-marriage advocates like
androkles who view it as something akin to a legal prison because I simply know too many people for whom it works extremely well. For many others, though, it's clearly a less-than-ideal arrangement. I think this is a consequence of it being something of a one-size-fits-all solution to a very complicated question. I'd always thought that queerfolk, being largely stranded outside of the traditional institution by societal norms, were in a unique position to come up with innovative and progressive alternatives and now I worry that too much energy is going into extending the existing institution to them without sufficiently altering it first.Of course, it's just these sort of alterations that most terrrify already married folk. I think
lhn has done a fantastic job of presenting how their defensiveness is motivated by fear of change rather than homophobia and it would behoove more activists to familiarise themselves with this mindset, since, as he points out, calling your opponents "bigots" is not exactly a winning strategy when it comes to making friends and influencing policy. For those who find themselves despairing in the face of so much resistance, longtime activist topaz_munro sees victory in the face of defeat.