Apr. 14th, 2004 09:49 am
Universidad Nacional Anónima de Mexico
Yes, I know, I should by a new radio so I don't wake up listening to NPR every weekday morning. It's on my list of Things To Do.
Today, they had a story on the plight of foreign-born children of illegal immigrants trying to go to college in this country. Since they can't apply for financial aid, even middling universities are completely out of reach for most of them. The focussed on one woman in particular with fantastic grades who would be able to write her own ticket if she were a US citizen.
What struck me about the story is that no one even raised the possibility of her returning to Mexico for her education. She's fluent in Spanish--the reporter even pointed out that she'd like to become a Spanish teacher. American-born students with those ambitions often spend at least a semester abroad. Students at UNAM (Latin America's largest unversity) pay a token fee of about $0.02 per semester.
Is she eligible for admission to a Mexican university? Frankly, I don't know. I could understand if the government of Mexico wasn't too happy about using local tax revenues to fund the education of a resident of another country. There are other potential obstacles as well: She'd have to live away from her family (which Hispanic students are often more loath to do than others--particularly in immigrant families where they may play a substantial role in providing support) and a place to live in Mexico City isn't free or necessarily very safe for a teenage woman. If she left the country, she might not be able to get back in. But I wish they'd at least raised the possibility in order to dismiss it.
Was it snobbishness that led to this omission and, if so, whose? The family's? The reporter's? I'm reminded of an online immigration debate between
zompist and a nativist many years ago now. The nativist claimed that Latin Americans move here for the amenities of civilised life--like proper infrastructure and higher education.
zompist pointed out that he might be surprised to find that there are highways and universities in Latin America as well.
Today, they had a story on the plight of foreign-born children of illegal immigrants trying to go to college in this country. Since they can't apply for financial aid, even middling universities are completely out of reach for most of them. The focussed on one woman in particular with fantastic grades who would be able to write her own ticket if she were a US citizen.
What struck me about the story is that no one even raised the possibility of her returning to Mexico for her education. She's fluent in Spanish--the reporter even pointed out that she'd like to become a Spanish teacher. American-born students with those ambitions often spend at least a semester abroad. Students at UNAM (Latin America's largest unversity) pay a token fee of about $0.02 per semester.
Is she eligible for admission to a Mexican university? Frankly, I don't know. I could understand if the government of Mexico wasn't too happy about using local tax revenues to fund the education of a resident of another country. There are other potential obstacles as well: She'd have to live away from her family (which Hispanic students are often more loath to do than others--particularly in immigrant families where they may play a substantial role in providing support) and a place to live in Mexico City isn't free or necessarily very safe for a teenage woman. If she left the country, she might not be able to get back in. But I wish they'd at least raised the possibility in order to dismiss it.
Was it snobbishness that led to this omission and, if so, whose? The family's? The reporter's? I'm reminded of an online immigration debate between
no subject
you are right--the news article didn't attempt to show whether or not she tried to get her higher education in Mexico. with her grades, she could probably get into the best universities there.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
But then, we also know Latino kids who don't really see the point even in finishing high school. Education for Latinos could use more encouragement, not discouragement. Do we win a prize if we can keep children of illegals out of our precious universities?
no subject
I have mixed feelings, too. In general, I'm deaf to the argument that being more humane to immigrants is a major factor in encouraging them to come here. I shook my head when the Illinois house recently disallowed granting driver's licenses to illegals, thereby forfeiting our (already shabby) ability to regulate them and forcing both decent and dangerous drivers alike to operate outside the law. And for what? What impoverished peasant is going to say, "Oh, I'd better not migrate to Chicago--they won't let me have a drivers license!"
But many illegal immigrants are motivated by the prospect of a better life for their children. Making it far easier to finance their children's higher education could well be an encouragement to migrate. I don't see this as bad for the USA, but it's tragic for countries that are already suffering from a serious brain drain. Do we need to give smart, ambitious Latin Americans more reason to give up on succeeding in their home countries?
We also know Caucasian and African-American kids who don't see the point of even finishing high school. I don't see the problems of encouraging educational attainment and immigration policy as intrinsically linked.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
By association, this calls to mind Jessica Abel's comic La Perdida, about an American expat in Mexico City (early 20s rather than teenaged) who gets drawn into various complications. (It's still ongoing, with an issue coming out approximately once every blue moon, so it's hard to fully evaluate, but I think it's well done so far.)