Sep. 19th, 2003 09:48 am
Real no irony liberation [Updated!]
Again,
mollpeartree surfs the web for news so I don't have to. Today, she has a link to the fascinating story of a visit to Iraq by a team of young exiles sowing the seeds of democracy. The stories of them founding debating societies and newsletters among college students make me misty-eyed. How you can be cynical in the face of bright young men and women discovering the meaning of "freedom" for the first time ever? And one of the exiles states how I feel about the current "End the Occupation" movement, but with all the moral authority that I can't give it:
[Addendum]
Currently, what I'm most worried about in Iraq is the typical American foreign policy response to grassroots democracy that--by some inexplicable miscalculation--doesn't result in a pliable client state with closely-alligned interests. This would only convince the rest of the Arab world that we don't really mean it when we say the d-word and, in the end, are no better than the local tyrants in Syria, Morocco, Egypt, Algeria, or anywhere else in the Arab world. I'm worried that "Islamic fundamentalism" (lumping together everything from al-Qaeda to the AK party in Turkey) will become the new Communism, to be resisted at all costs regardless of what this does to civil society or future prospects, rather than allowed to run its course and burn itself out (cf. Iran). Sorry, Mr Bremer, but the first post-Saddam Iraqi government is going to have a large Shiite component. It will be anti-Israel and ambivalent toward America and monkeying around to make it less so will only piss everyone off in the end and cause them to remember us as conquerors rather than liberators. Suck it up, and we could eventually have a staunch, stable ally whose existence will once and for all put the lie to the assertion that the Arabs must not be allowed out from the firm hands of despots.
She adds: "I find it absolutely incredible that the anti-war people are now calling for the coalition to leave straight away. Nobody in Iraq wants that. The opinion polls show it's just 13 per cent. Don't they care about the Iraqi people and what they want at all? This isn't a game. This isn't about poking a stick at George Bush. This is our lives."
[Addendum]
Currently, what I'm most worried about in Iraq is the typical American foreign policy response to grassroots democracy that--by some inexplicable miscalculation--doesn't result in a pliable client state with closely-alligned interests. This would only convince the rest of the Arab world that we don't really mean it when we say the d-word and, in the end, are no better than the local tyrants in Syria, Morocco, Egypt, Algeria, or anywhere else in the Arab world. I'm worried that "Islamic fundamentalism" (lumping together everything from al-Qaeda to the AK party in Turkey) will become the new Communism, to be resisted at all costs regardless of what this does to civil society or future prospects, rather than allowed to run its course and burn itself out (cf. Iran). Sorry, Mr Bremer, but the first post-Saddam Iraqi government is going to have a large Shiite component. It will be anti-Israel and ambivalent toward America and monkeying around to make it less so will only piss everyone off in the end and cause them to remember us as conquerors rather than liberators. Suck it up, and we could eventually have a staunch, stable ally whose existence will once and for all put the lie to the assertion that the Arabs must not be allowed out from the firm hands of despots.