Nov. 13th, 2002 08:46 am
Boxers or briefs?
I must admit, I consider this one of the silliest debates of our time. The gay mailing list I used to subscribe to errupted into regular flame-wars over their relative merits. Some people I know are very much partisans of one over the other. During my recent trip home for my father's birthday, I removed my pants in front of the family in order to iron them. "I trust no one will be offended," I said. My young nephew watched me with some curiosity and my sister-in-law told him, "See, it's okay to wear diapers since big boys like your Uncle Da wear them!"
I wear briefs for comfort reasons. My HUMONGOUS COCK just flops around too much in boxers. Often, when my boyfriend is lounging trouserless, his jewels just spill right out. What's the point of underwear that can't even keep your equipment in place? That's half the reason for wearing them. When I get a spontaneous hard-on, I'd like to know that it's being contained by by the poofy bit in the crotch of my pleated slacks. (When I'm wearing slacks, that is, which is when I'm at work. When I'm in black jeans at a gay bar, I want the WORLD TO KNOW!)
Yeah, they aren't particularly pretty. Particularly the white ones, which get too easily stained. And they show wear more easily. (Those holes that start just to one side of the fly and let my glans slip through are, paradoxically, part of my grounds for disparaging boxers. It strikes me they'd always feel like that.) But unless you're into the saggy pants look--still in the running for Worst Fashion Statement of All Time, btw--not many people will see them anyway. I have some special gear for, ahem, special occasions (or I just go BUTT NAKED) and the rest of the time, underpants is underpants. They is under.
With my boyfriend, I split the difference. No, I don't make him wear boxer-briefs. I want to see him put on briefs, but when he takes his pants off, I want him to be wearing boxers. I can't explain this. The best theory I've come up with is that I enjoy the unwrapping and boxers leave more to the imagination. However, the covering up process makes me sad and the briefs let me enjoy what I'll be missing just a tiny bit longer. *sigh*. Au revoir, ma petite cigale!
I wear briefs for comfort reasons. My HUMONGOUS COCK just flops around too much in boxers. Often, when my boyfriend is lounging trouserless, his jewels just spill right out. What's the point of underwear that can't even keep your equipment in place? That's half the reason for wearing them. When I get a spontaneous hard-on, I'd like to know that it's being contained by by the poofy bit in the crotch of my pleated slacks. (When I'm wearing slacks, that is, which is when I'm at work. When I'm in black jeans at a gay bar, I want the WORLD TO KNOW!)
Yeah, they aren't particularly pretty. Particularly the white ones, which get too easily stained. And they show wear more easily. (Those holes that start just to one side of the fly and let my glans slip through are, paradoxically, part of my grounds for disparaging boxers. It strikes me they'd always feel like that.) But unless you're into the saggy pants look--still in the running for Worst Fashion Statement of All Time, btw--not many people will see them anyway. I have some special gear for, ahem, special occasions (or I just go BUTT NAKED) and the rest of the time, underpants is underpants. They is under.
With my boyfriend, I split the difference. No, I don't make him wear boxer-briefs. I want to see him put on briefs, but when he takes his pants off, I want him to be wearing boxers. I can't explain this. The best theory I've come up with is that I enjoy the unwrapping and boxers leave more to the imagination. However, the covering up process makes me sad and the briefs let me enjoy what I'll be missing just a tiny bit longer. *sigh*. Au revoir, ma petite cigale!