Think of the children!

[muckefuck]

There's a scene near the end of The wedding banquet (a comedy about a partnered gay man who enters a sham marriage to please his family) where the beard pleads with the odd man out to stay in the relationship "for the sake of the baby". It got a good laugh in theatres because, at the time (1993), the idea of children being raised in non-traditional families was pretty new to most people, who never imagined hearing such a hackneyed phrase in such a situation.

Of all the reasons I thought of (most of which I rejected) for having some kind of public commitment ceremony to mark our legal marriage, I never once considered doing it "for the children". But when I floated the idea of having some sort of reception next year (perhaps coinciding with our one-year anniversary) to my sister on the phone to her last night, this was the justification she shared with me.

AWI is reportedly old enough now to begin cluing into murmurings about same-sex marriage among his peers, and my sister wants to make sure he's got strong reinforcement of her stance on it from the home. Apparently, the notion that "Uncle monshu and Uncle Da" could get married was something of a revelation to him, and so she thinks that marking the occasion in some way would make it "more real" to him and his sibs.

I hadn't really been thinking in terms of a family-friendly affair, but what the hell. Of course, given that they've been brought up on a steady diet of Catholic church weddings, I'm stumped what exactly would fit the bill. I mean, no way in hell are we standing up for this; you're not even going to get the Old Man in a tie. I'm thinking maybe a donut cake with two grooms on top and we're golden.