Date: 2012-10-17 07:58 pm (UTC)
Refusing the (possibly sarcastic) nominations of other members before the voting. No, really, THAT HAPPENED.

They did both claim that they would come to sub-committee meetings on the issue they were concerned about, but we'll see. Frankly the issue is taking too long to begin with (the board began talking about it nearly four years ago, and still no end in sight) so I'm actually hoping they were lying about that as I doubt they're interested in doing anything but obstructing progress.

Would blogging about the issue give them a plausible self-excuse for why they don't need to show up in person, I wonder?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

muckefuck: (Default)
muckefuck

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314 15161718
192021 22232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 04:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios