Refusing the (possibly sarcastic) nominations of other members before the voting. No, really, THAT HAPPENED.
They did both claim that they would come to sub-committee meetings on the issue they were concerned about, but we'll see. Frankly the issue is taking too long to begin with (the board began talking about it nearly four years ago, and still no end in sight) so I'm actually hoping they were lying about that as I doubt they're interested in doing anything but obstructing progress.
Would blogging about the issue give them a plausible self-excuse for why they don't need to show up in person, I wonder?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2012-10-17 07:58 pm (UTC)They did both claim that they would come to sub-committee meetings on the issue they were concerned about, but we'll see. Frankly the issue is taking too long to begin with (the board began talking about it nearly four years ago, and still no end in sight) so I'm actually hoping they were lying about that as I doubt they're interested in doing anything but obstructing progress.
Would blogging about the issue give them a plausible self-excuse for why they don't need to show up in person, I wonder?