Date: 2012-01-09 10:11 am (UTC)
There must be some awards which chime with my own ideas, but certainly there seems to be something about the Pulitzer criteria in particular which goes directly against what I think makes good writing, to the extent that I'm starting to see it more as a warning than a recommendation. In 2010 I conincidentally read three Pulitzer-winners in a row -- Styron's The Confessions of Nat Turner, a history of the CIA by Pulitzer-winner Tim Weiner, and....I forget the third. But I hated them all, and more to the point I just thought the writing was so technically bad that it removed all my confidence in the judges' standards.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

muckefuck: (Default)
muckefuck

January 2025

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314 15161718
192021 22232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 03:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios