There must be some awards which chime with my own ideas, but certainly there seems to be something about the Pulitzer criteria in particular which goes directly against what I think makes good writing, to the extent that I'm starting to see it more as a warning than a recommendation. In 2010 I conincidentally read three Pulitzer-winners in a row -- Styron's The Confessions of Nat Turner, a history of the CIA by Pulitzer-winner Tim Weiner, and....I forget the third. But I hated them all, and more to the point I just thought the writing was so technically bad that it removed all my confidence in the judges' standards.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-09 10:11 am (UTC)