muckefuck: (Default)
muckefuck ([personal profile] muckefuck) wrote2003-03-06 09:15 am

Family wedding dilemma

Yesterday, a slim personal note slipped in with the typical circulars and credit card solicitations in my mailbox. Since I never learned the surname of my stepbrother's fiancée, I was at first mystified. The note looked too humble to be a wedding invite in any case.

But that's what it is and it's left me in a bind. We've known for almost a year that they were planning to get married in California this summer and Monshu and I had started planning a vacation around it. Silly me, I had just assumed he would be invited. I've been with him almost four years and the three of them seemed to get along well during the family vacation last year. But his name wasn't on the envelope.

Strictly speaking, of course, this means he isn't invited. However, plenty of couples use formulations like "and guest" to avoid having to go through the trouble of learning who everyone's s.o.'s are. They didn't. So now I'm left with the equally unflattering conclusions that either (1) my stepmom's family is ignorant of wedding etiquette or (2) he's been deliberately omitted. That's their prerogative, of course. But I would like to think they know me well enough to know that it pisses me off--and that they like me enough that they wouldn't do that if they could avoid it. I don't want to get all shirty if this was a simple mistake or a difficult choice for them.

Of course, there's no easy way to find out. There's no polite, non-confrontational way to say, "Did you mean not to invite my boyfriend?"--especially given that chances are Monshu wouldn't even come if he were invited, since family events just aren't his thing. So I'm stuck having to find some delicate, indirect line of inquiry to avoid provoking the kind of pointless family squabble that weddings always seem to. Bleagh. And I was so looking forward to this one.

[identity profile] bunj.livejournal.com 2003-03-06 11:14 am (UTC)(link)
My impression, since said missive was a laser-printed piece of paper, was that this was not, in fact, the bonafide invitation. This was just something to inform people, and to let them make hotel reservations. I'm sure the official invitations will be sent out around two months ahead of the event, as is traditional. Whether Monshu or "and Guest" will be included on said invitation remains to be seen. I'd be happy to be your Elaine in this matter and start asking nosy questions.

[identity profile] muckefuck.livejournal.com 2003-03-06 12:06 pm (UTC)(link)
That clears up a lot of confusion, thanks. I've never gotten something like that before, so I wasn't sure what to make of it. I'd rather get the nosy questions out of the way now, before Monshu and I have to make plans, but we should have our opportunity soon.

One question though: How was yours addressed? To you and your wife individually? To "Mr & Mrs Bunji"? Only to you?

Re:

[identity profile] bunj.livejournal.com 2003-03-06 12:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd have to check, but I believe it was addressed to "Mr. bunj B--- and Ms. -e A----" (if you can decode my clever answer). That's why I'd still check to see if Monshu is invited. It could simply be because you don't live together.

sin of omission

(Anonymous) 2003-03-06 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, it was more of a "save the date" notice that is typically sent out to out-of-town guests about 6 months before the wedding to assist in making travel plans. (See you really should read more of the Ms. Manners books). I actually would not be surprised if Monshu received his own note. Ours was addressed to Mr BB and Ms EA (Yay - someone finally remembers I have my own name!).

-e

Re: sin of omission

[identity profile] muckefuck.livejournal.com 2003-03-06 02:30 pm (UTC)(link)
If he did, I will feel like such a drama queen!

And it's true, I should read more Miss Manners, if purely for selfish reasons of enjoyment. It's just hard for me to feel like tackling the wedding book when I know I'll never be having one.

Re: sin of omission

[identity profile] mollpeartree.livejournal.com 2003-03-07 06:57 am (UTC)(link)
If I recall correctly, Miss Manners doesn't believe in "and guest" or response cards in wedding invitations; the inviter is supposed to be able to take the trouble to find out the names of s.o.'s, while the invitee is supposed to be able to write an R.S.V.P. letter. (Or at least she didn't in her wedding etiquette book published back in the 80's. Possibly she has softened her stance since these customs are now completely ingrained.)

Re: sin of omission

(Anonymous) 2003-03-07 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
Nope - Ms. Manners still thinks response cards are for wimps and that "and guest" is the tool of a lazy bride. I had several people tell me to just send their invitation to my wedding with "and guest" instead of addressing an invitation to their so, even though, if I am inviting you to my wedding, it makes sense that I know your last name...

-e