![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
If it's smoke you hate, ban cars!
Those of you interested in discussion of Chicago's new comprehensive smoking ban and its relationship to civil rights could do worse than to check out Issue Chick's most recent rant and the ensuing commentary--in particular, the comments of ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
phaedrusdeinus (some of which are conveniently located at the top of the page). At the risk of doing violence to his arguments, I'll attempt to briefly summarise one of them: A ban this sweeping can only be justified on health grounds. However, if health is the issue, then why wasn't it dealt with in the same way as other health issues, like food quality, i.e. by setting minimum standards and then leaving it up individual proprietors to determine how best to meet them, rather than by attempting to legislate behaviour?
shawnwrites also has an intriguing idea in the form of a smoking license, which doesn't really address the underlying rights issues, but allows for more individual choice than the ban while at the same time putting more money in the pockets of the revenue department.
phaedrusdeinus (some of which are conveniently located at the top of the page). At the risk of doing violence to his arguments, I'll attempt to briefly summarise one of them: A ban this sweeping can only be justified on health grounds. However, if health is the issue, then why wasn't it dealt with in the same way as other health issues, like food quality, i.e. by setting minimum standards and then leaving it up individual proprietors to determine how best to meet them, rather than by attempting to legislate behaviour?shawnwrites also has an intriguing idea in the form of a smoking license, which doesn't really address the underlying rights issues, but allows for more individual choice than the ban while at the same time putting more money in the pockets of the revenue department.