ext_317852 ([identity profile] ursine1.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] muckefuck 2014-05-01 10:29 am (UTC)

"I don't think people should be required to offer services they have strong moral objections to, and … that religious objections in particular get a wide berth."

So that "wide berth" would extend to parents of a young child with DM I who refuse to allow treatment on religious grounds and relying on their "strength of prayer" to cure the DM I? And when the parents prayers "aren't strong enough" forces their child to endure a prolonged, painful, untimely death that could have been avoided. After all the child is the parents personal property with which they can do whatever they please.

Chuck

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting